i went alone to my oncologist appointment and came out of it a bit more worried then when i went in. she reiterated that i was taking a big risk without treatment...and she doesn't believe my tumor markers are accurately reflecting my cancer load. oh man, i didn't want to hear that. my markers have been really good, normal...oh how i like normal...the low numbers have been a comfort. when i have symptoms, i just say to myself, well, the tumor markers are good, so maybe it's nothing...but maybe it really is something. she knows how i feel about chemo at this point, but i know that it's possible that i may be so scared someday that i would do anything to help me live longer. she said she had a feeling i'd be sanguine about it...i wasn't sure what the word meant until i got home and looked it up. cheerfully optimistic, it said...hmmm. that doesn't sound quite right. maybe more accepting than optimistic...and i'm not sure about cheerful, either.
i met my old friend ben for lunch at absinthe (where jamie from top chef works). she was there, looking exactly like she looked on the show. ben and i bumped into each other some months ago after many years, and now we sometimes meet for lunch. he has been dealing with cancer of the tonsils. we both commiserated on the importance of feeling ownership of our bodies, making choices when we can, and standing by them, regardless of the result. ben is the opposite of me in many ways. he just came back from a trip to ethiopia -all by himself...he's a mountain climber, always up for an adventure, and he doesn't even own a television...so very opposite...as usual we were discussing relationships. he said that he didn't want to have the same argument over and over again with a partner...i said, welcome to the world of marriage. there's an old indian saying that there is only one man and only one woman. meaning, whatever relationship you're in will bring up the same issues - the same argument. i concur. i told him my most recent criteria game for love...(i was tripping about this the other day). if you were told that the person you love could live a happy and full life but you would never be able to see or contact them again, would you go for it? i thought about my answers, and i can't say it was a slam dunk, not as far as mitchell goes. for my mother and brothers, i would in a heartbeat. but it would be really hard for me to give up mitchell, even for his happiness and wellbeing...i've still got a long way to go to true love. (i just stopped and asked mitchell this question, sure that he would do this for me in a minute, but he said it would be really hard and he didn't know if he could)...i have mixed feelings about that...(and they're not all bad) luckily, those aren't the kind of decisions we have to make.
last night i got a facebook message from someone i was once knew, like a lifetime ago. we haven't seen each other since we were teenagers...i don't even remember how or why our friendship ended, but i know it was very painful to me at the time. she also was diagnosed with cancer around the year i first was, and it recently came back in her lungs...she wrote that she was totally bald and would send pictures. i wonder if i'll even recognize the 17 year old girl that meant so much to me back then - now 50 something in a head scarf... she put me on her church prayer list. i love all the lists i'm on...she's on my list too now...we would've never guessed what our lives had in store for us way back then...